Corporate media is curious. Conservative media is chuckling. Alternative media is sounding the klaxons. Meanwhile, the puppet masters over the Biden-Harris regime are fist-bumping each other over another expansion of the climate change Overton Window.
The White House dropped a report Friday detailing their support for research into blocking sunlight in their efforts to fight climate change. As Michael Snyder noted, this concept was already being tossed around by the European Union earlier in the week. That didn’t garner the attention the Globalist Elite Cabal expected, so they commanded the White House to sign onto the ludicrous concept a few days later.
Let’s be clear: Even the most unhinged climate change cultist wouldn’t think this sounds like a good idea. Lest we forget, these are the people who claim nuclear power is bad and cow farts are dangerous. One might think people who are so gullible would latch onto a sun-blocking maneuver, but that’s not the case. The cultists aren’t interested in any solution that does not force totalitarian control on their neighbors, the downfall of capitalism, and a bearhug embrace of Neo-Marxism.
Blocking the sun just doesn’t check enough of their climate change cult boxes.
This so-called “potential solution” is designed to push insanity levels to eleven so they can reel it back in with horrible ideas that are slightly less insane. Those who are against monitoring personal carbon emissions and tying the results to one’s ability to live their day-to-day lives might find the notion intrusive, but it’s better than blocking out the sun, right? That’s why idiocy is proposed as plausible by the Globalist Elite Cabal.
Here are the details about the White House’s drop from Discern Reporter:
White House Supports Research Into Blocking the Sun
A recently published research document on the White House website has shed light on the Biden administration’s willingness to explore the concept of blocking sunlight as a potential measure to combat climate change. The document, released by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy on Friday, reveals that the team has been studying “geoengineering” methods aimed at preventing sun rays from exacerbating global warming.
The University of Oxford defines “geoengineering” as the intentional large-scale intervention in the Earth’s natural systems to counteract climate change. The report titled “Congressionally-Mandated Report on Solar Radiation Modification” outlines the specific geoengineering methods under consideration by the Biden administration, including “stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) and marine cloud brightening,” along with research into “cirrus cloud thinning.”
The introduction to the report clarifies that research on “space-based approaches” has not been a focus due to the relative ease of implementing atmospheric approaches.
The document emphasizes that it is primarily a research plan aimed at understanding the potential impacts of solar radiation modification (SRM) rather than a blueprint for deployment. The research would contribute to a better understanding of basic climate processes, the effects of human greenhouse gas emissions, and the outcomes of SRM.
Survival Beef on sale now. Freeze dried Ribeye, NY Strip, and Premium beef cubes. Promo code “jdr” at checkout for 25% off! Prepper All-Naturals
The summary highlights that a research program exploring the scientific and societal implications of SRM would enable informed decisions on its potential risks and benefits as part of climate policy. It also acknowledges that such a program would prepare the United States for possible SRM deployment by other public or private actors.
The report points out that SRM could offer the prospect of significant planetary cooling within a few years.
However, the White House issued a separate statement assuring the public that there are no plans at present to establish a comprehensive research program focused on solar radiation modification.
Controlling Protein Is One of the Globalists’ Primary Goals
Between the globalists, corporate interests, and our own government, the food supply is being targeted from multiple angles. It isn’t just silly regulations and misguided subsidies driving natural foods away. Bird flu, sabotaged food processing plants, mysterious deaths of entire cattle herds, arson attacks, and an incessant push to make climate change the primary consideration for all things are combining for a perfect storm to exacerbate the ongoing food crisis.
The primary target is protein. Specifically, they’re going after beef as the environmental boogeyman. They want us eating vegetable-based proteins, lab-grown meat, or even bugs instead of anything that walked the pastures of America. This is why we launched a long-term storage prepper beef company that provides high-quality food that’s shelf-stable for up to 25-years.
At Prepper All-Naturals, we believe Americans should be eating real food today and into the future regardless of what the powers-that-be demand of us. We will never use lab-grown beef. We will never allow our cattle to be injected with mRNA vaccines. We will never bow to the draconian diktats of the climate change cult.
Visit Prepper All-Naturals and use promo code “veterans25” to get 25% off plus free shipping on Ribeye, NY Strip, Tenderloin, and other high-quality cuts of beef. It’s cooked sous vide, then freeze dried and packaged with no other ingredients, just beef. Stock up for the long haul today.
Important: Our sponsors at Jase are now offering emergency preparedness subscription medications on top of the long-term storage antibiotics they offer. Use promo code “Rucker10” at checkout!
They do indeed herd and move people by repeatedly pushing for extreme measures and then slightly backing off, but in this case I doubt anybody’s going to get extremely worked up over spraying water into the air to form more clouds. Fine with me. Stick some sprayers/misters out in the desert somewhere, and spray away.
Of course a lesser expensive approach would be to just create lakes. They will reflect more sunlight, and also by increasing water surface area, expose more water to evaporation.
And of course if you’re going to go with that most sensible and inexpensive approach, while you’re at it you might as well just make the lakes hydro-electric projects, and address several problems at once.
Then again, we all know the most sensible, least totalitarian, least beneficial, most intrusive approaches will be the first proposals to be tossed in the trash can.
As most Christians know, prior to the flood, when God changed creation for a second time, the Earth had a “firmament” of water in the air, which diffused the sunlight. This is why no rainbow’s had ever been seen prior. And the seasons also changed and/or became more pronounced (Gen 8:22), since the firmament would’ve acted to even out temperatures year round. Yet God said that the new state of creation was stable. The rainbow being a sign that He will keep His word. And it has been stable for millennia ever since.
It wasn’t just a big flood. The entirety of creation was changed. Food source apparently changed (Gen 9:1-5). People began to have shorter life spans. That science has been known and understood ever since.
But yeah, divert some water into arid regions where it will more readily evaporate, create lakes, hydro projects, living space, grow more greenery. Fine with me. I don’t see any downsides. In Genesis 9:1, God said again to be fruitful and multiply, and that time also said “fill the earth”.
If they want to generate more cloud cover, that’s as good a way as any.
Of course, I fully expect their “study” will conclude something entirely different and less sensible.
The cleanest, most consistent, most reliable, most “renewable” means of producing energy is the utilization of gravity. Wind and solar are hit and miss. But gravity is constant. If clean and green is what they want, then it doesn’t get any cleaner and greener than hydro. But they’ll ignore this option like running from the plague, because it doesn’t fit their narrative and true agenda.
* most beneficial and least intrusive