The skeptic in me wants to wait to hear from “official” sources, including Speaker of the House Mike Johnson who is allegedly in contact with the whistleblower. But everything about the document seems to jibe with not only what has been rumored but also what we saw during the ABC News presidential debate last week.

Here are the first six pages of the document (TL:DR highlights below):

Here are some of the key points according to the whistleblower’s affidavit:

• ABC News was coordinating with Kamala Harris’ campaign far more than with Donald Trump’s campaign.
• They agreed to not ask questions on certain subjects that would have been detrimental to Harris. The same considerations were not offered to Trump, nor did his campaign ask for them.
• “Sample” questions were provided to the Harris campaign and not to Trump’s.
• Fact-checks on Donald Trump were required by the Harris campaign.
• Harris was not to face comparable fact-checks.
• Split-screen views were required to favor Harris.

It is noteworthy that the affidavit was signed, notarized, and mailed out BEFORE the debate. The fact that everything the whistleblower detailed appears to have happened makes this exceedingly damning.

Can this turn into something big? Can this be used against the Harris campaign, ABC News, or both? It’s hard to tell. In a sane world this would be the bombshell that annihilates ABC News’ credibility and shreds the prospects for Team Kamala. Since we don’t live in a sane world there’s no telling whether this will be memory-holed, debunked, subjected to massive gaslighting, or a combination thereof.

We’ll see. All we know for sure is that if this is real and accurate, it needs to be shared far and wide.