Report: Elite Northeast Colleges ‘Abysmal’ on Free Speech

(The Center Square)—New York University, Columbia, Harvard and several other elite Northeast colleges are among those with poor rankings for free speech, according to a new report.

All three universities, located in New York and Massachusetts respectively, received “abysmal” rankings for their free speech climates in the annual report, released on Thursday by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. Harvard University retained its position as the lowest-ranked institution for free speech for the second consecutive year, the report noted.

“Some of the nation’s most lauded higher ed institutions are failing miserably in upholding First Amendment protections,” Sean Stevens, FIRE’s chief researcher, said in a statement. “Often these schools set the tone for the wider higher ed ecosystem, so it is imperative that they address these issues lest this failure drag the rights of a whole new generation of college students down with it.”

The report ranked the free speech climates of more than 250 American colleges and universities based on a survey of over 58,000 students nationwide. Most of the colleges and universities were ranked “average,” while only three received a “good” grade. The University of Virginia, Michigan Technological University and Florida State University had the healthiest speech climates in 2024, according to the report.

At least six colleges, including Liberty University in Virginia and Baylor University in Texas, were listed as “warning” schools with “policies that clearly and consistently state that it prioritizes other values over a commitment to freedom of speech.”

Other regional universities included in the FIRE report were Dartmouth College in New Hampshire — which ranked 224th and earned a “below average” grade — and the University of Vermont, which placed 233rd and received a “below average” rating. Rutgers University, New Jersey’s elite public school, also received a “below average” ranking, placing 198th in the list.

The report also delved into whether students felt they needed to self-censor themselves in response to the political climate on campuses. Students who self-described as “very conservative” reported self-censoring most often, with 34% saying they do so “very” or “fairly” often, according to the report. In contrast, only 15% of “very liberal” students reported self-censoring “very” or “fairly” often, according to FIRE’s pollsters.

FIRE also surveyed students’ views on the Israel-Hamas War, which has been the source of often violent demonstrations and occupations on many elite college campuses over the past year.

The foundation surveyed about 3,000 students for their views on encampments and protests on their campuses over the past year. Nearly three-quarters of students said it is “rarely acceptable,” while about 60% said it was “rarely acceptable” to occupy university buildings as part of demonstrations.

More than a quarter of Jewish students surveyed by the group said they feel “very” or “somewhat unsafe” on their college campuses, while nearly half of Muslim students said police responses to encampments made them feel unsafe.

“The Middle East crisis plunged campuses into absolute chaos last academic year and administrators largely failed in their response, clamping down on free speech protections instead of fostering spaces for open dialogue,” Lukianoff said. “The nightmare scenarios of last spring cannot be repeated this fall. Colleges need to reassert their mantle of being marketplaces of ideas, not bubbles of groupthink and censorship.”