Despite over a half-century of trying, Republicans still have not figured out how to get conservative judges to consistently do conservative things.
Admittedly, Republicans have improved at this over time, helped by the rise of the Federalist Society and the collapse of the filibuster for judicial nominees. However, the courtroom disappointments keep coming, most famously Bostock v. Clayton County, where Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch read “gender identity” into the definition of “sex” in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Just last term, the Supreme Court delivered another disappointment in its abortion case FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, ruling for the Food and Drug Administration on the arcane issue of standing when it should have ruled for Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine on the more pressing issue of FDA egregiously breaking its own rules to approve the abortion drug mifepristone on loose terms.
The main reason for Republicans’ struggles is that their preferred judicial philosophy, originalism, produces inconsistent results. Liberal justices always vote liberal on cases that really matter. Conservative justices do not always vote conservative and can often be peeled off to the liberal side.
In Bostock, the four liberal justices voted as a bloc and peeled off two conservative justices (Neil Gorsuch and John Roberts) to join them. This pattern has occurred for many years, skewing the Supreme Court’s case law left over time. Once-unimaginable feats of leftist creativity such as Obergefell v. Hodges are now unimaginable to repeal, while the conservative movement’s greatest legal victory, Dobbs v. Jackson, came after 49 years of Roe v. Wade, included squishy concurrences from Justices Roberts and Kavanaugh, and has been followed up with abortion non-victories such as Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. If this is the best Supreme Court existing originalism can offer, conservatives should be looking for an upgrade.
The current problem with originalism is that it has no definitive way to deal with ambiguity. The originalist movement began as a reaction to the famously bad-faith Warren Court, which created a panoply of new rights with no statutory basis whatsoever. Conservatives responded by asserting originalism as their new creed. […]
— Read More: thefederalist.com
Controlling Protein Is One of the Globalists’ Primary Goals
Between the globalists, corporate interests, and our own government, the food supply is being targeted from multiple angles. It isn’t just silly regulations and misguided subsidies driving natural foods away. Bird flu, sabotaged food processing plants, mysterious deaths of entire cattle herds, arson attacks, and an incessant push to make climate change the primary consideration for all things are combining for a perfect storm to exacerbate the ongoing food crisis.
The primary target is protein. Specifically, they’re going after beef as the environmental boogeyman. They want us eating vegetable-based proteins, lab-grown meat, or even bugs instead of anything that walked the pastures of America. This is why we launched a long-term storage prepper beef company that provides high-quality food that’s shelf-stable for up to 25-years.
At Prepper All-Naturals, we believe Americans should be eating real food today and into the future regardless of what the powers-that-be demand of us. We will never use lab-grown beef. We will never allow our cattle to be injected with mRNA vaccines. We will never bow to the draconian diktats of the climate change cult.
Visit Prepper All-Naturals and use promo code “veterans25” to get 25% off plus free shipping on Ribeye, NY Strip, Tenderloin, and other high-quality cuts of beef. It’s cooked sous vide, then freeze dried and packaged with no other ingredients, just beef. Stock up for the long haul today.
