DEI (which stands for diversity, equity, and inclusion to its proponents and discrimination, exclusion, and intolerance to some of its critics) is now spreading to the U.S. State Department. Actually, it’s something of a surprise, given how obsessively identity conscious the Biden administration is, that this initiative didn’t occur earlier. Was that an oversight?
Or perhaps those already working in the State Department prided themselves on how ultracompetitive it is to win a job as a foreign service officer (FSO)—securing such a position is something of an elite accomplishment—and therefore perhaps they tried behind the scenes to preserve State’s long-established meritocratic character.
Be that as it may, Ambassador Gina Abercrombie-Winstanley, who has served as State’s diversity and inclusion officer since April 2021 (and who plans to step aside soon), defended the department’s push for more DEI in the coming months and years in congressional hearings last week. Among other details, Abercrombie-Winstanley noted that more than 80 percent of the State Department’s diplomatic corps currently is white, implying that that percentage may be too high from a DEI perspective.
The common political slogan used to sell DEI initiatives to the public is that its proponents want such-and-such a workforce to “look more like our country as a whole.” On a superficial level, that slogan may seem innocuous and unobjectionable, but on closer examination, it’s problematic. If looks make the difference between an employee doing a good job or a not-so-good job, then looks would be an important factor in hiring. In reality, however, looks by themselves don’t cut it.
As is always the case with DEI, it introduces a battle of the Q’s—quotas on one hand versus qualifications and qualities on the other. Imagine a volatile political situation in a South American country. The American president wants to pursue a policy of maintaining contacts with various political figures and parties in that country without offending any of those parties since they don’t trust each other. That can require very delicate diplomacy. Do you think the Secretary of State or one of his top deputies would say, “Wait a minute, it’s about time we put a black gay person out there to speak on behalf of our country”? Don’t you think it would be better to deploy a FSO who understands the history, economics, culture, tradition, and language(s) of that country—one with a deep feel for personal sensitivities in that country, and someone who has the moxie and wisdom to accurately communicate our government’s intentions while not committing any potentially disruptive verbal faux pas? We certainly don’t want to risk triggering an international incident just so someone can say domestically, “Well, at least our State Department matches the demographic profile of American society.”
What concerns me most about what looks like the Biden administration’s push for more blacks and fewer whites in the State Department is that the president’s proposed budget calls for $76 million to be spent by the State Department in the next year on DEI initiatives. $76 million?! I realize that amount is probably considered pocket change in today’s Washington, but you could hire 500 people to work in DEI at State for $150,000 in annual salary and still have change left over.
Abercrombie-Winstanley says that State wants to be able to provide a precise breakdown of the composition of its workforce by race, gender, ethnicity, status of disability, etc. Pardon me, but why would State need millions of dollars to do this when computers can keep track of each employee’s identity and print out updated profiles of the entire workforce as often as wanted?
Or maybe the plan for the $76 million is to “beat the bushes” and see how many more of various minorities State can drum up through various recruitment and advertising activities. This is the approach that some colleges have taken. They hire a DEI officer whose job amounts to scouring the countryside to locate members of the desired minority group. Then they convince them to enroll in the DEI officer’s college. (Alas, in the college town where I lived for years—not in Grove City, where I taught —the students that were recruited by DEI turned out to be a disaster for the college. They just weren’t able to handle the coursework.)
The question that State will inevitably have to deal with, whether they like it or not, will be whether the people they’re looking for even exist—that is, whether sufficient numbers of members of various minority groups have the professional expertise and personal qualities needed to handle the formidable challenges of a FSO.
Certainly, in this day of Zoom conferences and instant communications, State can find inexpensive ways to send recruiting materials to every college in the land without coming close to spending $76 million. If they want to try to find more qualified minorities, fine, but throwing a lot of money at the problem seems gratuitous.
One problem with the DEI movement is that they’re looking for a quick fix to a longstanding problem. It is true that certain minorities seem underrepresented in important places like the State Department. But what if the desired numbers of truly qualified minorities just aren’t there? We, as a society, need to address the root causes of underqualified minorities. My nominee for first among those root causes is the sorry state of public education in so many of our inner cities. I say that as one who did some teaching in urban schools decades ago, both visiting a number of schools in a substitute capacity and then teaching and counseling at a special inner-city school for dropouts. Frankly, by the time students left those broken schools (finally escaping from them), they were doomed never to acquire the intellectual skills needed for a demanding job like FSO.
If the Biden administration wants to start expanding opportunities for minorities, it should turn its attention to improving education. That means somehow breaking away from its codependence on teachers’ unions and making school choice universal. Fix the schools, and over the next generation, many of the undesirable racial and other disparities in the adult job market will show marked improvement.
Article cross-posted from our premium news partners at The Epoch Times. Image by AgnosticPreachersKid, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Controlling Protein Is One of the Globalists’ Primary Goals
Between the globalists, corporate interests, and our own government, the food supply is being targeted from multiple angles. It isn’t just silly regulations and misguided subsidies driving natural foods away. Bird flu, sabotaged food processing plants, mysterious deaths of entire cattle herds, arson attacks, and an incessant push to make climate change the primary consideration for all things are combining for a perfect storm to exacerbate the ongoing food crisis.
The primary target is protein. Specifically, they’re going after beef as the environmental boogeyman. They want us eating vegetable-based proteins, lab-grown meat, or even bugs instead of anything that walked the pastures of America. This is why we launched a long-term storage prepper beef company that provides high-quality food that’s shelf-stable for up to 25-years.
At Prepper All-Naturals, we believe Americans should be eating real food today and into the future regardless of what the powers-that-be demand of us. We will never use lab-grown beef. We will never allow our cattle to be injected with mRNA vaccines. We will never bow to the draconian diktats of the climate change cult.
Visit Prepper All-Naturals and use promo code “veterans25” to get 25% off plus free shipping on Ribeye, NY Strip, Tenderloin, and other high-quality cuts of beef. It’s cooked sous vide, then freeze dried and packaged with no other ingredients, just beef. Stock up for the long haul today.
How this article is both written and presented is most tragic!
“One problem with the DEI movement is that they’re looking for a quick fix . . .”
First, it is NOT a movement but an organized assault on North America, a subset of the Identity Politics Strategy, but most importantly: communist political minder systems!?
Why oh why does this article’s author, and far too many others, NOT comprehend this?!?!
THIS has zero to do with affirmative action or minority representation of any kind: the DEI systems — or political minder systems —- were first overtly implemented in the DoD/Pentagon by SecDef MARK ESPER, in the Trump Administration! (Trump momentarily retracted his head from his buttocks and finally fired globalist/WEFer Esper —- Atlantic Council, Aspen Strategy Group, etc.!)
This is ALL part of the Great Reset structured plan — none of this pertains to “movements” or spontaneous events, all extrmely well funded and highly efficiently organized, yet the author of this piece is still hopelessly CLUELESS —- and he is not alone in that regard!
“We, as a society, need to address the root causes of underqualified minorities.”
The globalists or commies present a false narrative (as usual) and Mark Hendrickson addresses their false narrative as if ALL their points were valid and honestly presented —- no wonder DEI systems are now in place across North America!
I am truly sorry to see this appear in The Epoch Times — a newspaper I have both long subscribed to and donated to as well!?
[SIDEBAR: A few years back, around 2018 in Washington state, a Referendum 1000 was placed on the ballot which its supporters CLAIMED pertained to “Affirmative Action” yet the verbiage in it seemed to only concern itself with crony hiring?! Thankfully, it was voted down and many of us assumed, wrongly, it was ONLY about corrupt crony political hiring but it turned out it was a strategem to insert specially selected teachers in the public school systems to promote Maoist thought, transgender ideology and adult sex education down to the Kindergarten and pre—K levels!
TPTB were later successful in the 2020 election, passing the Comprensive Sex Education Program, while the governor, Xi Inslee, signed legislation dramatically lowering the standards for public school teachers so the “right people” could be hired to promote this vile stuff —- and that referendum was promoted by the Gates Foundation–funded Advocates For Youth, originally founded by the Rockefeller Foundation in 1980 and called the Center for Population Options, since rebranded! THEY are weasel cunning on many levels and never give up —- clueless types who take them at their word are the reason we are losing!]
“We, as a society, need to address the root causes of underqualified minorities.”
Dude, are YOU stuck in a time warp?! We are not a society, we are under communist rule!
This nation has experienced exponential increases in the offshoring of American jobs, the insourcing of foreign visa replacement workers and millions of illegals — while so–called teachers routinely teach ILLITERACY via the “Whole Language Program”!
You sound like a “Leave It To Beaver” episode —- that was long ago.
I read tons of DEI articles per week and this has got to be the most ignorant and uninformed one yet —- please do research communism and communist systems sometime!?