During their interview at SiriusXM’s “Megyn Kelly Show,” author and blogger Vani Hari and investigative journalist and filmmaker Grace Price appealed to American food makers to produce foods with the same healthier ingredients the companies use in identical products they sell in other countries.

“We have an opportunity right now to let the American public know about unsafe ingredients in foods sold in the U.S.,” Hari said during the interview. “We are under a massive experiment. If any other country was doing this to us, it would be considered an act of war … We’ve got to do something about it.”

“Right now, American food companies are using toxic ingredients that [in other countries] are either banned or regulated differently, in the same products that they serve American citizens,” Hari added.

According to her, McDonald’s French fries contain 11 ingredients in the U.S., but only three in other countries. Skittles also uses 10 different artificial food dyes in the U.S., as well as titanium dioxide, which is “banned in Europe because it can cause DNA damage.”

Hari also noted that Kellogg’s pledge in 2015 to remove artificial food dyes from its cereal products by 2018 didn’t materialize. She lambasted the food company for lying about it and for creating new cereals that were targeting the smallest of children. She added that they even used popular toddler songs like “Baby Shark” and Disney’s “Little Mermaid” to attract younger consumers.

The nutrition advocates blamed the U.S. government for “negligent” food regulations.

“Almost every single major American food company is doing this because they’re using the lack of regulation in our U.S. food system to their advantage,” Hari further lamented, recalling that in 1958, there were only 800 food additives approved for use. Now, the U.S. has approved more than 10,000, while the European Union has only approved less than 400.

She singled out the Food and Drug Administration for not reviewing thousands of chemicals.

“They’ve been literally just slid right into the food system without anybody knowing what the risks are, what the safety data looks like,” Hari said

She also blamed these additives for the skyrocketing figures of diseases, including cancer. For example, she said, the neon food coloring in Froot Loops cereal is “contributing to obesity.” Hari also cited the dangers of glyphosate, the active ingredient in the widely used herbicide Roundup produced by Monsanto, now owned by Bayer, which has been linked to human health risks.

“It’s pervasive, and unfortunately, it’s making its way into every single thing we eat,” Hari said. “It’s in wheat, it’s in oats, you’re finding it in all major products, like Cheerios.”

Studies indicate that glyphosate has been implicated in causing non-Hodgkin lymphoma, bladder cancer, autoimmune disorders, leaky gut and fertility issues. (Related: Avoid harmful chemicals like glyphosate in food by ALWAYS choosing ORGANIC.)

It’s not too late for manufacturers to promote use of non-toxic ingredients in food

For the two advocates, it is still possible for U.S. food manufacturers to promote the use of non-toxic ingredients in food.

In fact, Hari launched a petition asking Kellogg’s to finally remove artificial food dyes. “I think a lot of lobbying behind the scenes and a lot of front groups behind the scenes, were doing that work,” Hari said. “This is not the nanny state. This isn’t asking for more regulations. This is, ‘You’re already doing this across the pond. Do it for us.'”

Price, meanwhile, urged parents to resist the temptation to buy highly marketed foods targeting children.

“You’ve got to start by giving them something real, because kids – if they’ve been fed all of these crappy ultra-processed foods their whole lives, they don’t desire anything real because that’s what they think food is,” Price said.

According to Price, there is an “ideological dogma” that chronic diseases “are genetic and random and out of our control.” That line of thinking “is sending a message that your health is out of your control, but is in your doctor’s hands,” she said.

Visit FoodScience.news for more stories like this. Watch the video below that talks about how not all healthy food sold in the market is healthy.

This video is from the 100% Clean Food Lifestyle channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• ABSURD: Age-old Big Food shills at TIME MAGAZINE now trying to flip the script on processed foods.
• Big Food, Big Pharma responsible for creating DANGEROUS U.S. dietary guidelines that actually HARM people.
• Top 6 TRICK PHRASES Big Food and Big Pharma use to sell you toxic products.
• Big Food, Big Pharma colluding to keep Americans DIABETIC and OBESE to maximize profits.

Sources include:

• ChildrensHealthDefense.org
• FoodWatch.org
• Brighteon.com

The group anticipates that Trump and his allies will repeat their large-scale attempt to undermine confidence in the election before Nov. 5 and then work to overturn election outcomes by challenging ballots and results in court in the days and weeks after voting.

Jim Messina, Obama’s 2012 campaign manager, chairs the PAC, which can raise and spend unlimited sums of money. The PAC also includes Norm Eisen, a key figure in the first impeachment attempt against Trump, and T.J. Ducklo, who previously worked for President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

“We are not messing around with this, too much is on the line and we have seen what Trump is capable of when he loses an election fair and square,” Messina said in a statement. “We are going to be stepping up and providing resources directly to state parties and allies on the ground to make sure every American can cast their vote with confidence and without interference.”

While Democrats claim they need to “protect” the election from Trump, with Messina saying they won’t let Trump “undermine” the election, Democracy Defenders’ launch appears to be a preemptive strike against any attempts to ensure integrity and transparency in the voting process.

With an initial $10 million budget, the group is set to bombard the courts and media with resources to counter any Republican efforts to question the election results, to allow the Harris campaign, especially in down-ballot races, to prioritize their resources to election turnout, and persuade voters, especially when it comes to paid media.

“The threat to American democracy has only grown more intense since Donald Trump encouraged a violent mob to stop the peaceful transfer of power nearly four years ago. Trump and his allies are already working to undermine the fundamental right we have as Americans to vote and to have our vote counted fairly,” Messina claimed. (Related: DEM DOOM: Democrat donors to withhold $90M from largest pro-Biden super PAC if Biden stays on ticket.)

PAC to launch $60M advertising campaign to boost Trump’s campaign

Trump’s supporters are not left behind as a super PAC called Right for America is launching what is expected to be a $60 million advertising campaign to boost the former president‘s campaign right after Labor Day.

According to the New York Times, the media buy is the latest addition to an already busy and costly advertising season that is set to see over a half-billion dollars spent to shape voters’ final impressions of Harris and Trump.

Right for America has already raised tens of millions of dollars but waited until the fall rush to air any advertising. The group had $38 million on hand as of June 30 and had not spent its money earlier.

“For the past four months we have worked hard to raise close to $60 million,” said Sergio Gor, who runs the group and is a friend of the Trump family. “We have now started spending in the key swing states and will do everything we can to ensure President Donald Trump is returned to the White House.”

Many of the PAC’s biggest donors are members of Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s club in Florida. The group’s main funders have been Ike Perlmutter, the longtime chair of Marvel Entertainment, and his wife, Laura, who have put at least $20 million into the super PAC. Right for America has received fund-raising help from Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, who has headlined finance events for the group in Monterey, Beverly Hills, Seattle and at the Republican National Convention.

The advertisements are set to be seen predominantly on cable and network television, with the remainder on digital and radio advertising, plus a few small contributions to other outside groups. One new ad, called “Laughing Matter,” aims for Harris’ record on the border, calling her “dangerously liberal.”

Another group, MAGA Inc., has received more than $100 million this cycle from businessman Timothy Mellon, an heir to the Mellon banking fortune and has $56 million in television ads booked through Election Day. Another, Preserve America, is expected to take in more than $100 million from Miriam Adelson, a conservative megadonor, but has not made most of its fall reservations yet, with only $7 million booked through November.

Democrats, on the whole, have $315 million reserved for television and radio over the final 10 weeks of the campaign, compared to $140 million reserved by Republicans, according to AdImpact.

Trump.news has more stories related to Trump’s journey on his way back to the White House. Watch the video below that talks about RFK Jr.’s support for Trump.

This video is from the Flyover Conservatives channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Trump says he is “certainly” on board with appointing “brilliant” RFK Jr. to a position in his administration.
• Technocrats awaiting Trump’s victory to launch military projects and reduce AI regulation.
• Trump economic team mulls sanctions on nations that REFUSE to trade using U.S. dollar.
• 10 Burning questions that every American should be asking about the Trump shooting.

Sources include:

• TheNationalPulse.com
• NBCNews.com
• NYTimes.com
• Brighteon.com

In a Substack newsletter, Dr. William Makis cited a paper from 2020 (by Juarez et al) on the antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically feasible concentrations where it was found to support its clinical development as a repositioned cancer drug.

According to the study, at a human dose of two mg/kg, ivermectin can achieve anti-cancer effects such as cell cycle arrest (inhibit proliferation), preferential inhibition of cancer stem-like cells, synergize with several chemotherapy drugs and inhibit tumor growth in a breast cancer mouse model.

Ivermectin was tested at two mg/kg/day, translating to roughly 5uM in vitro concentration. They found that the drug goes after cancer stem cells, which tend to be resistant to chemotherapy.

“Ivermectin has a preferential depletion effect on the cancer stem-like cell population,” the authors included in the research. “We observed that among all the evaluated cell lines, a decrease in cell viability and clonogenicity is more evident in the cancer stem-like cells than in their parental population.”

It also found that the most sensitive cancer cell lines were the ovarian, breast, glioblastoma (brain), lung, colon, uterine squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), hepatocellular, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), pancreatic and endometrial.

Meanwhile, the least sensitive were osteosarcoma, gastric and melanoma.

Moreover, lymphoma and leukemia cell lines appear to be more resistant to Ivermectin but the drug has a significant impact on those cells’ ability to form colonies, according to the study. (Related: Ivermectin can “kill cancer cells” and boost immune response, suggest health experts.)

Makis further highlighted that this was the first study he had ever seen that had tested as many as 28 cancer types with ivermectin.

“No wonder it’s hidden from the public,” he commented.

NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN Tested against 28 types of Cancer – which cancers were most sensitive to Ivermectin? Which were least sensitive?

A research group from Mexico investigated Ivermectin in Cancer

Paper: 2020 (Juarez et al) – Antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically… pic.twitter.com/xWhgEBa1uv

— William Makis MD (@MakisMD) August 26, 2024

FDA took down social media posts discouraging ivermectin use for COVID-19 but mainstream media seemed to have missed this

Back in March, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agreed to permanently take down its social media posts urging people to avoid the usage of ivermectin for COVID-19.

One of the pages that the agency has removed was a page that said: “Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? No.” It also took down posts, including one that reads: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

The move was done following a lawsuit with a settlement filed with a federal court in Texas that ordered the agency to delete another page titled “Why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19 within 21 days.”

The article said that ivermectin was neither authorized nor approved to be used to prevent or treat COVID-19 in humans or animals. It also claims that evidence does not support the efficacy of ivermectin against coronavirus.

On June 2, 2022, Doctors Paul Marik, Mary Talley Bowden and Robert Apter filed a lawsuit against the FDA and its secretary Robert Califf, as well as the Department of Health and Human Services and its secretary Xavier Becerra. They accused the FDA of meddling with their capacity to practice medicine. The lawsuit was first turned down on the basis that the FDA has “sovereign immunity.” However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overruled the lower court’s ruling, stating that the “FDA is not a physician” and “even tweet-sized doses of personalized medical advice are beyond the FDA’s statutory authority.”

Ivermectin has long been approved for use in both animals and humans. In cases of humans, the drug is recommended to treat parasitic infections such as river blindness disease, threadworm infestation, tropical eosinophilia, roundworm infestation, whipworm infestation, filariasis (also called elephantiasis) and loiasis.

On X, formerly Twitter, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden wrote: “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”

Moreover, independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr in a tweet said: “The FDA is biased against many low-cost, generic, and/or natural therapies with low-profit potential. Could it be because half its funding comes from Big Pharma?”

Ivermectin is not an exceptional case. The FDA is biased against many low-cost, generic, and/or natural therapies with low profit potential. Could it be because half its funding comes from Big Pharma? https://t.co/LxpqLuvb6A

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) March 22, 2024

Australian politician Craig Kelly also called the FDA “corrupt,” stating that they have “blood on their hands.”

Head over to Cancer.news for more stories, similar to this.

Sources for this article include:

• Makismd.substack.com
• HindustanTimes.com

The revelation that DNA contamination can lead to birth defects or cancer surfaced when Dr. Robert Malone, the biochemist who helped invent the mRNA vaccine, made an appearance at House of Representatives hearing led by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA).

According to Malone, Moderna has a patent that acknowledges RNA is preferable to DNA in vaccines due to risks of insertional mutagenesis, which might activate oncogenes or inhibit tumor suppressor genes.

“Moderna has a patent on the use of RNA for vaccines,” Malone stated. “And in that, Moderna explicitly acknowledges that RNA is superior to DNA for vaccine purposes because problems, including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis that could lead to the activation of oncogenes or the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes.”

“FDA [Food and Drug Administration] says they’re not aware of any concerns, but Moderna, in its patent, lays out the same concerns about DNA in insertional mutagenesis and genotoxicity,” Malone continued. He added that Moderna knew DNA was a contaminant but was left in because of how they make it.

“They use DNA to make RNA, and then they degrade the DNA and then they have to purify the degraded DNA away from the RNA and the process they are using is not that good,” he said.

Another Big Pharma company also eventually acknowledged that its jabs, which were meant to “cure” COVID-19, are also contaminated with cancer-causing DNA fragments. In the documentation to regulatory bodies, Pfizer omitted information about the presence of Simian Virus 40 sequences in its vaccine.

The documentation suggests that there are certain DNA sequences present in the vials that are normally not allowed in anything that is going to go into humans, “not the least of which is an antibiotic resistance gene,” Malone explained.

“They include these sequences from SV 40 – not the whole virus, but highly active promoter sequences – which is exactly the thing that the FDA in their older regulations said must be avoided because it confers even more risk for insertional mutagenesis.”

He added that the FDA did not take the raw DNA sequences, reconstruct those plasmid maps and look at them themselves. Instead, they took for granted what Pfizer had given them.

“And now this is all coming out because of what these researchers found,” he further said.

Malone warned that the potential consequences for jab recipients are “anything that is associated with DNA damage, i.e., birth defects and cancer being the most notable ones.” (Related: Moderna’s mRNA COVID jab 30% more deadly than Pfizer’s, VAERS data shows.)

Get ready for the “updated COVID-19 vaccines”

Despite the recent admission, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna’s updated vaccine is expected to be available in either August or September.

According to public health officials, they preferred the term “updated vaccines” in line with the need to formulate a new vaccine every year to match circulating variants like what they did for the flu shot.

“Historically, when we’re talking about COVID vaccines, we’re talking about boosters that would happen at some time post your previous vaccine,” said Dr. John Brownstein, the chief innovation officer at Boston Children’s Hospital. “Now we’re targeting annual vaccines for COVID-19 that are similar to flu. It’s a reformulation based on what’s circulating, and this is why we’re talking about an annual campaign rather than a booster.”

The updated 2024-25 COVID-19 vaccines will target the JN.1 lineage of the virus, which is claimed to be an offshoot of the omicron variant. Pfizer and Moderna vaccines will be available for six-month-old babies and adults while the Novavax vaccine will be available for those aged 12 and older.

Last month, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended Americans receive the updated 2024-25 vaccine when it becomes available.

“CDC recommends everyone ages six months and older receive an updated 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine to protect against the potentially serious outcomes of COVID-19 this fall and winter whether or not they have ever previously been vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine,” the CDC website indicated.

The updated jab is not considered a booster.

“We have to remember that this virus is constantly changing and that your protection from previous infection or previous vaccines declines over time,” Brownstein said. “Making sure that you receive the most updated formulations of vaccine will ensure that you have the most recent protection and we of course assumed that like previous years.”

Read more about the dangerous side effects of mRNA vaccines on VaccineInjuryNews.com. Watch the video below that says the Japanese government launched a task force to investigate the COVID-19 vaccines’ crimes against humanity.

This video is from the Follower of Christ777 channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• Pfizer, Moderna rolling out new “catch-all” mRNA injections for “pandemic influenza.”
• SCARE TACTICS: U.S. government gives Moderna $176 million to develop mRNA bird flu vaccine for next fake scamdemic.
• mRNA vaccines are extremely toxic, Moderna scientists now warn.

Sources include:

• SHTFPlan.com
• ABCNews.go.com
• CDC.gov
• Brighteon.com

“The next time someone implies you’re a bigot for thinking Kamala Harris is a terrible candidate for president, simply point them to her Senate record,” she said on the social media platform.

Based on Halikias’ cited bills, Harris was not into lifting the average American’s spirits or economic status. “Kamala, the tried and true Marxist, spent her time dragging us deeper into the abyss of DEI [Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion] with the legislation she sponsored and introduced,” Revolver News wrote in a July 25 article.

According to the independent news outlet, most bills she involved herself in were laced with insane race equity issues, squatter’s rights and a “bevy of loony environmental red tape that’s been a nightmare for American businesses and workers.” Thus, making the woman heavily unfit for the presidential seat.

In a thread on X, Halikias listed the bills she initiated in the Senate. One is the “Ensuring Diverse Leadership Act,” which according to Halikias is a generic form of affirmative action in hiring for the Federal Reserve. The bill indicates that the Fed must interview one individual who is reflective of gender diversity and one of racial diversity. (Related: Tennessee Rep. Burchett: Kamala Harris is a DEI VICE PRESIDENT.)

She also introduced the “Climate Equity Act of 2020,” which established a Climate and Environmental Equity Office at the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to investigate the racial climate impact of every single bill.

Harris’s other sponsored bill was called the “RELIEF Act,” which basically legalized squatting by renters in response to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The bill was to prohibit all evictions and foreclosures during the year and increases in rent. “Not to be confused with the ‘Rent Relief Act of 2019,’ which creates a tax credit for people living beyond their means,” Halikias added in the thread.

Another bill was the “Environmental Justice for All Act,” which according to the internet warrior, means a bunch more advisory boards and programs about race and climate.

Harris also initiated a resolution based on her own political opinion. She introduced S. Res.498, which is to condemn Stephen Miller for allegedly “trafficking in bigotry, hatred and divisive political rhetoric.” She also enjoined the Senate’s sentiment saying that the resolution is “expressing the sense of the Senate that Miller should immediately resign from office.” Miller was senior advisor for policy and White House director of speechwriting to former President Donald Trump.

She also had a suggestion for illegal migrants’ employment when she introduced the “American Dream Employment Act of 2019” that would allow illegal aliens to easily receive work authorization.

Took a leisurely e-stroll through
the legislation Kamala Harris introduced or sponsored during her time in the Senate.

It is not an exaggeration to say the vast majority of it is inane race equity stuff, squatter’s rights, and mandating useless environmental reports:

— Amalia C. Halikias (@AmaliaHalikias) July 24, 2024

Harris casts herself as “underdog” in the presidential race

Harris reportedly cast herself as the “underdog” in the presidential race. Reuters also reported that when Harris spoke at a private fundraiser, headlined by singer-songwriter James Taylor, in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, she said much of the rhetoric coming from Trump and his running mate, U.S. Senator JD Vance, was “just plain weird.”

Also, the Harris campaign called Trump “old and quite weird” following his appearance on Fox News on Thursday. According to the news outlet, she and the party’s use of the word “weird” to describe her opponents was part of a new strategy from Democrats.

Harris, 59, during her multiple campaign stops last week, again contrasted her background as a prosecutor with Trump’s record as a convicted felon. She said her bid was about the future, while Trump, 78, wanted to return the country to a “dark past.”

Hours later at a rally in St. Cloud, Minnesota, Trump responded, asserting that Harris would “destroy the country” and criticizing her on issues ranging from public safety to immigration. “If a crazy liberal like Kamala Harris gets in, the American dream is dead,” Trump said, adding that Harris is “even worse” than Biden.

Meanwhile, Republican VP candidate Vance called out the “Democratic heir” for saying that he would only be loyal to Trump and not to the United States. She also called him a “rubber stamp for [Trump’s] extreme agenda.”

“Now, I saw the other day Kamala Harris questioned my loyalty to this country. That’s the word she used; loyalty. And it’s an interesting word. Semper Fi: loyalty, because there is no greater sign of disloyalty to this country than what Kamala Harris has done at our southern border,” said Vance. “And I’d like to ask the vice president, what has she done to question my loyalty to this country? I served in the United States Marine Corps. I went to Iraq for this country. I built a business for this country.”

Vance added, “And my running mate took a bullet for this country. So, my question to Kamala Harris is, what the hell have you done to question our loyalty to the United States of America?” “And the answer, my friends, is nothing,” he stated.

Head over to CancelDemocrats.news for more stories like this.

Sources for this article include:

• Revolver.news
• Reuters.com

Amidst Bolivia’s bid to join the BRICS group, Arce, supported by international allies, addressed and defused the situation, reaffirming his commitment to democracy and swearing in new military commanders. The now dismissed military chief was ordered to six months of “preventive detention” for his role in leading the failed coup against the government.

Following Wednesday’s unsuccessful coup, observers have raised suspicion that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was part of the master plan. Users on X, formerly known as Twitter, speculated that the coup attempt was secretly backed by the CIA, either because of Bolivia’s vast supplies of lithium, in retaliation for its closeness to Russia or its hostility to Israel. One X user said: “This is the second CIA-backed coup plot against the Bolivian state in under five years. Bolivia has 21 million tons of lithium reserves, the largest on the planet. Bolivia also cut off all relations with Israel in condemnation of the genocide in Gaza. Coincidence? I think not.” A comment that seemed to refer to the U.S. from Puerto Rican communist “Combate” said: “They own Argentina. They own Chile. They’re going after Bolivia.”

A different post highlighted Arce’s recent trip to St. Petersburg and talks between Bolivia and Russia on nuclear research. “Let’s not pretend we don’t know who is responsible for today’s coup, this is the work of the U.S. CIA,” the post said.

Meanwhile, Great Game India reported that Zuniga was seeking to prevent former President Evo Morales from running for president again. He claimed that the former chief would harm the country. However, a Bolivian court has already declared Morales unable to run again.

Just like X users, analysts also believe that the CIA is involved in the failed resistance. Suspicion of the U.S. in Bolivia, stemming from the CIA’s historical support for Latin American military regimes and the State Department’s involvement in several coups under Henry Kissinger, has left a lasting legacy on the political life of the South American country, which has seen over 190 coup attempts in its history. (Related: How the CIA helped discredit Hunter laptop story for Biden win.)

Also, Bolivia is a contender for BRICS membership, which is likely to take place at the BRICS leaders’ conference in Kazan, Russia on Oct. 22. Arce has been vocal about his commitment to the intergovernmental organization’s worldview. In fact, he and Russian President Vladimir Putin met at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum last month, June 5-7, and they discussed the importance of the emerging multipolar world, free of neocolonialism and the strictures of the “rules-based order.” So, if Zuniga was successful in his coup attempt, Arce’s removal from power would be convenient for those forces targeting Brazil.

In a speech to supporters at the palace, Zuniga “saluted those officers who wear their uniform with pride and value the Armed Forces in a democratically-elected government,” Los Tiempos, a Bolivian newspaper, said. The Presidents of Brazil, Mexico and Venezuela all issued statements of support for Arce while Bolivia’s Foreign Minister Celinda Sosa Lunda urged the international community to come out in support of Arce and Bolivian democracy.

Arce celebrates Zuniga’s failed coup attempt

The former Army commander has been handed a terrorism charge, which carries 15-20 years in prison, as well as a charge for an armed uprising, which carries a sentence of 5-15 years. The Attorney General’s Office requested the six-month detention and said other government bodies, including the Defense Ministry and Interior Ministry, supported the request “due to the importance and seriousness of the events that occurred,” state prosecutor Cesar Siles said.

Within hours of the attack, Zuniga urged the soldiers to withdraw, after leaders from around the world blasted the army’s actions as illegal. Zuniga later claimed that he was following an order from Arce, who has denied having any involvement in or prior knowledge of Zuniga’s operation.

The Bolivian president hailed the withdrawal as a victory for Bolivia’s democracy and addressed the country’s citizens in the aftermath, some of whom had taken to the streets in protest of the alleged coup attempt. “Many thanks to the Bolivian people,” said Arce. “Long live democracy.”

A video has been shown on Bolivian television showing Arce facing down Zuniga and a group of soldiers in a palace hallway on Wednesday. “I am your captain, and I order you to withdraw your soldiers, and I will not allow this insubordination,” Arce said.

Zuniga was Arce’s hand-picked leader for Bolivia’s military. But as he entered the presidential palace on Wednesday, Zuniga cited the malaise in the country as the reason why he started the resistance. “The three chiefs of the armed forces have come to express our dismay. There will be a new cabinet of ministers. Surely things will change, but our country cannot continue like this any longer,” Zuniga told a local TV station. “Stop destroying, stop impoverishing our country, stop humiliating our army.”

Check out BigGovernment.news for similar stories.

Sources for this article include:

• GreatGameIndia.com
• Reuters.com
• Newsweek.com
• https://www.aljazeera.com

According to a New York Post article, Soros pumped $400 million into the radio outlet Audacy in February. The said network reaches 165 million monthly listeners and includes a handful of conservative shows from hosts including Sean Hannity, Dana Loesch, Mark Levin, Glenn Beck and Erick Erickson.

A source with knowledge of the deal told the news outlet that the idea that “Soros is buying hundreds of local radio stations right before a national election and will keep broadcasting Sean Hannity and other conservative talk radio hosts on Audacy is not credible.”

Soros Fund Management needs help from the FCC to take control of the network as the money funneled into buying the bankrupt network comes from abroad. Under existing FCC rules, foreign company ownership of radio stations in the United States is not allowed to exceed 25 percent, but a filing acquired by the Post included a request from Soros asking the commission to make an exception.

In response, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr said that the FCC should not create a special Soros shortcut. He added that when it comes to a broadcast station acquisition of this size and magnitude, the FCC needs to run its full and normal review process.

“The FCC should not be skipping steps or waiving required agency processes,” Carr pointed out.

An alarm about this was first set off by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) in April. He said that this transaction, which affects radio stations that reach millions of listeners across the U.S., should, at minimum, be subject to rigorous FCC oversight to ensure U.S. radio stations are not subject to undue influence.

“Audacy owns more than 220 local radio stations in over 40 markets and is the second-largest American radio group behind iHeart,” a press release from Roy’s office read. “The Soros group says that skipping the foreign ownership review at this time will enable the FCC to expedite its approval of the Soros applications and thus allow them to more quickly realize their ownership interests in, and take the reins at, these hundreds of local radio stations across the country.” (Related: Texas congressman slams George Soros over his acquisition of radio giant Audacy.)

He had earlier written the Soros group would usually petition to get its foreign funding sources vetted by the FCC first, but that they are trying to waive that process and put it off “until sometime down the road, indicating that those foreign stakeholders will be given ‘special warrants’ in the meantime.”

Meanwhile, critics believe the FCC’s influence is likely to be muted once the billionaire takes over and imposes his agenda, as he did with other media acquisitions.

Sources told the Post that Soros’ stake is equal to about 40 percent of the company’s senior debt, a massive chunk which, although not a majority, could yield effective control of the media giant when it emerges from bankruptcy.

Media watchdog: Soros spent $80 million to “silence” Americans

The timing of the deal, just months before the 2024 presidential election, has raised eyebrows all across the United States. One insider said he felt it possible Soros was buying the stake to exert influence on public opinion in leading up to the election. “This is scary,” the source said at the time.

In fact, a new report by the media watchdog Media Research Center (MRC) indicated that Soros gave over $80 million to affiliated groups calling for “censorship” ahead of November’s critical election.

“One of the wealthiest men in the world is using his vast wealth and power to silence regular Americans ahead of the 2024 election. At a time when defending free speech is key, leftists are trying their best to shut down the voices of half of America, especially those who disagree with the radical agenda promoted by Biden, Soros and most Big Tech executives,” MRC Free Speech America Vice President Dan Schneider told Fox News Digital.

Last month, Free Press boasted about a letter urging executives at Discord, Google, Instagram, Meta, Pinterest, Reddit, Rumble, Snap, TikTok, Twitch, Twitter and YouTube to keep online platforms “safe and healthy” in 2024 through six specific “interventions.” The letter was signed by 200 civil society organizations, researchers and journalists. However, MRC found that “at least 45 of the signatories have had their coffers packed with Soros cash to the tune of a whopping $80,757,329 between 2016 and 2022 alone.”

“It appears its true design is to pressure Big Tech companies to silence speech the left despises as 60 countries across the globe gear up for their elections in 2024,” MRC associate editor Joseph Vazquez wrote. “But even more disturbing was the letter’s implication that its primary target is interfering in the 2024 U.S. election. This development is directly in line with Soros’ brand, who has dedicated millions of his ungodly fortune to groups looking to interfere in elections by stifling online speech.”

Visit Soros.news for stories about the globalist George Soros. Watch the video below that talks about how the Biden government does nothing as Soros destroys America.

This video is from the InfoWars channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• House committee opens probe of donations by Soros-linked Tides Foundation to U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
• George Soros, the King of Funded Mayhem, has America taking a very HARD LEFT turn towards communism and a permanent police-state society.
• Globalism on the airwaves: Soros fund now bankrolling radio stations.

Sources include:

• 100PercentFedUp.com
• NYPost.com
• FoxBusiness.com
• Brighteon.com

However, capital immobility hindered trade among countries. Since encouraging free trade was one of the initial goals of the system, it was undermined by capital immobility, leading to the collapse of the Bretton Woods system.

The Burning Platform‘s economic and political writer Brandon Smith recently warned: “Think of world reserve status as a ‘deal with the devil.’ You get the fame, fortune, trophy dates and a sweet car for a while. Then one day the devil comes to collect and when he does, he’s going to take everything, including your soul. Unfortunately, I suspect collection time is coming soon for the United States.”

According to him, the Department of the Treasury understands that there is constant demand for dollars overseas as a means to more easily import and export goods. The petrodollar monopoly made the U.S. dollar essential for trading oil globally for decades. Of course, the central bank of the U.S. has been able to create fiat currency from thin air to a far higher degree than any other central bank on the planet while avoiding the immediate effects of hyperinflation, he added.

As a result, the cash ended up in the coffers of foreign central banks, international banks and investment firms. Sometimes it is held as a hedge or bought and sold to adjust the exchange rates of local currencies. As much as 60 percent of all U.S. currency and 25 percent of the national debt is owned outside America.

The current problem is that the Fed is overprinting dollars that it stows currency, but it has time constraints. Eventually the effects of overprinting “come home to roost.” And it may take a brand-new Bretton Woods-like system that removes the dollar as the global reserve currency and replaces it with a new digital basket system like the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights (SDR) currency.

Lately, international banks are already expressing a shift from a dollar-based financial world to using a central bank digital currency (CBDC)-focused system built on unified ledgers. This will place the IMF as the middleman controlling the flow of digital transactions. (Related: IMF “working hard” on new global CBDC platform to replace dollar and other national currencies.)

“We could end up in a world where we have connected entities to some degree, but some entities and some countries that are excluded. And as a global and multilateral institution, we’re sort of aiming to provide a basic connectivity, a basic set of rules and governance that is truly multilateral and inclusive,” the IMF noted in a discussion on centralized ledgers in 2023.

Former White House economist says BRICS could swing an “economic wrecking ball” at dollar dominance

Thanks to BRICS, a bloc comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and, as of 2024, new members Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates, an economic wrecking ball could be swung to break dollar hegemony, especially since the bloc has been gaining more influence and growing its size.

This was according to former White House economist Joe Sullivan. In a recent op-ed for Foreign Policy, he pointed to mounting fears that BRICS nations could create a currency to rival the U.S. dollar in international trade. Though BRICS officials have said there is no such rival currency in the works, the group could pose a threat to the greenback based on its growing influence, Sullivan warned.

Now that Egypt, Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia already joined BRICS, they could influence over 12 percent of all global trade. That’s because those three countries surround the Suez Canal, a key passage for goods to flow into international markets.

The economist further said that BRICS has major sway in commodities markets. Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates are among the world’s top exporters of fossil fuels. Brazil, China, and Russia, meanwhile, are major exporters of precious metals.

Saudi Arabia’s joining could give BRICS a major advantage. The Middle Eastern nation owns over $100 billion in U.S. Treasury bonds, which has helped bring BRICS’ total holdings in the Treasury over $1 trillion, Sullivan further stated.

“The BRICS+ nations do not need to wait until a shared trade currency meets the technical conditions typical of global reserve currency before they swing their newly enlarged economic wrecking ball at the dollar,” he added.

Sound off about this article on the Economic Collapse Substack.

DollarDemise.com has more stories on the death of the dollar. Watch the video where Andy Schectman talks about economic Armageddon, forced CBDC and BRICS. This video is from Sarah Westall’s channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

• IMF says SEIZURE of frozen Russian assets must have sufficient legal support.
• IMF hints that countries will soon be able to repay debt using Chinese YUAN currency.
• Move over USD: Argentina uses Chinese yuan to settle IMF debt.
• IMF unleashes Unicoin, a new global CBDC intended to enslave the entire planet under a one world digital currency.

Sources include:

• CorporateFinanceInstitute.com
• TheBurningPlatform.com
• Expose-News.com
• Markets.BusinessInsider.com
• Brighteon.com

Marc Girardot, citizen scientist and author of multiple breakthrough articles on COVID-19, recently published in his Substack newsletter to address the “big elephant in the room” and discuss why he thinks COVID-19 vaccine “accidents” described as rare is not only deceptive; it is, in his honest opinion, criminal. Girardot’s writeup was an open letter to Vaccine Safety Research Foundation founder Steve Kirsch, evolutionary theorist Bret Weinstein and former Fox anchorperson Tucker Carlson, where he presented his brainchild, the Bolus Theory.

According to him, he dedicated the past three years of his life to unraveling the mystery of COVID-19 vaccine injuries. His theory is the outcome of a detailed root-cause analysis that he undertook, which explains all the adverse events by the fact that a significant dose of vaccine is directly injected intravascularly. Said injection bypasses many protections set in place by evolution and triggers cardiovascular and capillary damage throughout the body, as well as cancers and genetic disorders.

Bolus is a concentrated dose of particles directly injected or infused into the bloodstream, typically to deliver a drug or a product in a concentrated fashion to an organ. “It is dangerous because (A) the [intravenous] IV injection avoids the disseminative effect of the vascular system with 270,000 times the magnifying-glass effect, which causes considerable concentrated damage to blood vessels’ walls given the vaccines trigger T-cell attacks, and (B) because a bolus can reach deeper and contaminate hidden away high-replication stem cells, triggering a variety of dominos explained below notably cancer,” he explained.

He added that the vaccination campaign most likely harmed 40 times more worldwide. Yes, not everybody dies, not all organs hit are life-threatening and severities can vary but the people are harmed nonetheless, often for life and with degenerative disease in some cases. “My estimate points to one in 20 injections going IV accidentally. By that account, 670 million people worldwide would have been harmed, to one degree or another. And studies of accidental IV injections suggest that 127 million people have been harmed clinically,” he said, adding that as per VAERS, the elderly represent 75 percent, or 13 million, of the deceased. However, the damage was proven to be not age-related.

He further tackled that bolus damages many other less sensitive organs and mostly were reported to have had myocarditis and heart failure. But there are more illnesses and disabilities listed such as autism, autoimmune diseases, bowel inflammatory diseases, cancer, endocrine disorders, infertility, genetic disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, obesity, reproductive disorders, organ failures, skin and muscle disorders and tinnitus.

The scientist also cited celebrities who were hit with vaccine-associated illnesses or sudden death in the past three years like Ashton Kutcher, Bruce Willis, Carlos Santana, Celine Dion, Eric Clapton, Jamie Foxx, Justin Bieber, Matthew Perry and Ray Liotta. (Related: Employers that mandated COVID-19 injections for workers can be held LIABLE for vaccine injuries, Australian court rules.)

Learn how COVID-19 shots can make people sick or even kill them

To raise public awareness, a renowned doctor and public speaker, in collaboration with Brighteon University, will present a comprehensive multipart video training titled “20+ Mechanisms of Injuries: How COVID-19 injections can make you sick… and even kill you.” It is packed with the truth about injuries related to COVID-19 shots that are backed up with science.

In the never-before publicly released series, 20 of the top 40 mechanisms of injury will be presented by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, who has 20 years of experience researching the damages caused by vaccines. She predicted we would see a mass number of these injuries in our population and it is ever more apparent as we dive into 2024.

The series will feature the signs and symptoms following the coronavirus injections as well as the connections between the illness and the shots. It will also touch on why and how the shots cause the injuries. Once victims find out they were damaged by the jabs, the documentary will give instructions on how to file a clear and informative VAERS report and educate physicians and health practitioners, too.

The course begins streaming on March 9 at 12 p.m. EST and runs through March 19 at 12 p.m. EST. Catch the streaming schedule and register for free at Brightu.com.

Sources for this article include:

• CovidMythBuster.Substack.com
• Brightu.com

Dynamic pricing, a term used for charging higher rates at peak times and dropping them at slower ones, has become commonplace in industries such as e-commerce, and mobile apps have made it easier for companies to study consumers’ buying and browsing and quickly adapt. Rising costs in recent years have led more business owners to implement it. Food establishments like San Diego-based Cali BBQ are experimenting with a form of the dynamic pricing long used by airlines, hotels and ride-hailing services. Technology providers pitch services that enable restaurants to change prices weekly or monthly, increasing or slashing the cost of a taco or sandwich between a few quarters to several dollars, depending on demand and sales patterns.

Heather Haddon, a Wall Street Journal Chicago reporter, cited fast food giant Wendy’s as having drawn public scrutiny after it said in a mid-February earnings call that it was looking to test dynamic pricing. It said it would invest around $20 million in its U.S. restaurants to install digital menu boards by 2025 that could suggest items to customers and present different offerings depending on the time of day.

Meanwhile, some restaurants, like the sit-down ones, are charging more for prime seats during peak hours, Haddon further reported. One example is the Gene and Georgetti, a historic Chicago steakhouse where Frank Sinatra once regularly dined. In late 2022, it implemented dynamic pricing on two booths frequented by celebrity customers. As per managing partner Michelle Durpetti, diners would have to pay a $20 fee when they book the booths at busy hours, helping counterbalance the restaurant’s rising expenses.

However, Wendy’s discovered last month that customers like happy-hour discounts and other deals at slow times, industry consultants said. But that is not how it works. Instead, prices will go up across the board. Then to get the discount you will have to go off-peak. “People know how much a small fry or burger costs,” said Matthew Tucker, head of the reservation platform Tock, which offers dynamic pricing options to the 7,000 restaurants that use its services. “If they mess with that formula, you must be careful.” (Related: Bidenomics: Big Mac extra value meal now costs $10 more than it did during Trump’s era.)

Dynamic pricing is not a good idea: marketing professor

Due to the dynamic pricing announcement, headlines like “Wendy’s to roll out Uber-style surge-pricing” flooded the news and #BoycottWendys trended on social media. Wendy’s rival Burger King quickly took advantage of the news with a “No urge to surge” promotion.

For Vivek Astvansh, associate professor of Quantitative Marketing and Analytics at McGill University, the burger joint’s early announcement of its dynamic pricing was a serious mistake. The restaurant’s CEO said it would introduce dynamic pricing “as early as 2025,” at least nine months before customers needed to hear about it.

“I assume Wendy’s did this because it wanted to impress its shareholders and boost its stock price,” Astvansh said. “In fact, the cynic in me wonders whether this incident was ‘staged’ – that is, Wendy’s was testing the waters to see whether they could preannounce the price hike to impress shareholders, and then not actually implement the changes.”

He said that the backlash put Wendy’s on the defensive and it looked like a classic public relations disaster. According to the professor, research has shown that companies often preannounce price increases a few days to several months in advance and may withdraw some of these preannouncements if they realize that the price hike may cause more damage than an increase in revenue. But either way, announcing a decision nine months in advance seems premature. And I haven’t seen any evidence that Wendy’s planned for customers to hear the news along with investors.

“My advice is for executives to be astute in communicating price increases so consumers take the company’s perspective and don’t view the hike as unfair. That may mean avoiding terms that elicit hostile reactions or providing explanations for their decisions, such as an increase in the cost of ingredients or employee salaries. Consumers who understand the reasons for a price hike may be more accommodating,” he said.

He also discouraged other restaurants which wanted to increase menu prices during hours of high demand. “I hope they learn from Wendy’s error and frame their price increases strategically,” he advised. “Otherwise, they shouldn’t be surprised when competitors eat their lunch.”

Sources for this article include:

• MishTalk.com
• WSJ.com
• TheConversation.com