- Young people who received multiple COVID jabs were significantly more likely to die than those who skipped the shots, according to data from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics
- An analysis by The Exposé revealed that, in February 2023, those who received four COVID-19 shots had a 318% higher mortality rate than the unvaccinated group
- The other months analyzed showed four-shot teens and youth were between 221% and 290% more likely to die than those who didn’t get the shot
- Another study found that, compared to unvaccinated children, vaccinated children had significantly higher rates of asthma, allergies, eczema, respiratory infections, behavioral issues and other health conditions
- Separate research showed “for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA [COVID-19] injections”
(Mercola)—Young people who received multiple COVID jabs were significantly more likely to die than those who skipped the shots, according to data from the UK’s Office for National Statistics (ONS).1,2 The data include deaths by vaccination status from April 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023, when the COVID-19 shot campaign was in full effect.
When The Exposé analyzed the data, they revealed the disturbing finding that those with the most COVID-19 shots fared the worst:3
“Our analysis focused on mortality rates per 100,000 person-years from January to May 2023 among residents in England aged 18 to 39, and what we found is truly shocking. Initial observations of the data prove that individuals in this age bracket who had received four doses of a COVID-19 vaccine exhibited higher mortality rates compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.”
Mortality Rate 318% Higher Among Quadruple-Jabbed Youth
As noted by Canadian oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis, “The more mRNA shots you take, the greater the immune system damage,” which can lead to a host of health problems, not the least of which is a greater risk of impaired cancer surveillance and turbo cancer.4
The Exposé analysis suggests multiple shots also raise mortality rates among those aged 18 to 39 years. In every month, those who received four COVID-19 shots were significantly more likely to die than those who hadn’t received any. In January 2023, for instance, those who never received a COVID-19 shot had a mortality rate of 31.1 per 100,000 person-years.
But among the quadruple jabbed, the rate was 106 per 100,000 person-years. Even among those who had received one COVID-19 shot, the mortality rate was much higher than the unvaccinated at 53.3 per 100,000 person-years that month. According to The Exposé:5
“For the remaining months, unvaccinated teens and young adults mortality rate remained within the 20-something per 100,000 person-years. Whereas four-dose vaccinated teens and young adults’ mortality rates only went as low as 80.9 per 100,00 in April and remained within 85 to 106 per 100,000 for the remaining months.
The January to May average mortality rate per 100,000 person-years was 26.56 for unvaccinated teens and young adults and a shocking 94.58 per 100,000 for four-dose vaccinated teens and young adults. Meaning on average, the four-dose vaccinated were 256% more likely to die than the unvaccinated based on mortality rates per 100,000.”
In February 2023, however, those who received four COVID-19 shots had a 318% higher mortality rate than the unvaccinated group. The other months showed four-shot teens and youth were between 221% and 290% more likely to die than those who didn’t get the shot.6
“These figures are extremely worrying and strongly suggest that Covid-19 vaccination increases a person’s mortality rate, which in turn suggests Covid-19 vaccination may actually be killing teens and young adults in the tens of thousands,” The Exposé reported.7
COVID-19 Shots Killed More People Than They Saved
Other research has reached similar conclusions that mRNA COVID shots may be deadly. A now-retracted narrative review published in the journal Cureus called for a global moratorium on mRNA COVID-19 shots,8 citing significant increases in serious adverse events among those who received the injections, along with an “unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio.”9
When factoring in absolute risk and the “number needed to vaccinate” (NNV), a metric used to quantify how many people need to be vaccinated to prevent one additional case of a specific disease, the review found “for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections.”10
As for why the paper was retracted, study author Steve Kirsch said, “It’s about supporting the narrative.”11 Board-certified internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, another of the paper’s authors, called the retraction a “stunning act of scientific censorship.”12
In addition to calling for a global moratorium on mRNA COVID-19 shots, the authors of the paper — M. Nathaniel Mead, Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., Russ Wolfinger, Ph.D., Jessica Rose, Ph.D. Kris Denhaerynck, Ph.D., Kirsch and McCullough — said the shots should be immediately removed from the childhood vaccine schedule, while boosters should also be suspended.
“It is unethical and unconscionable to administer an experimental vaccine to a child who has a near-zero risk of dying from Covid-19 but a well-established 2.2 percent risk of permanent heart damage based on the best prospective data available,” the paper notes.13
The moratorium is warranted based on the shots’ risks of serious adverse events, the mechanisms behind those adverse events, mortality data and issues with inefficacy, vaccine control and processing.14 According to the review:15
“Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits.
Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs [serious adverse events] and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.”
Are Unvaxxed Children Healthier Than Vaxxed?
Another study that runs counter to the narrative was also retracted. The research, by Dr. Paul Thomas, who had his medical license suspended after he became widely known for supporting informed consent for vaccinations, and James Lyons-Weiler, with The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK), analyzed data spanning a 10-year period within a pediatric practice.
- Preserve your retirement with physical precious metals. Receive your free gold guide from Genesis Precious Metals to learn how.
It focused on comparing health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.16 The data showed vaccinated children had significantly higher rates of:17
- Asthma
- Allergies
- Eczema
- Sinusitis
- Gastroenteritis
- Respiratory infections
- Middle ear infection
- Conjunctivitis
- Breathing issues
- Behavioral issues
Further, none of the 561 children who were not vaccinated had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), while 0.063% of partially and fully vaccinated children did. “The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling,” they wrote.18
The study also points out that the rate of autism spectrum disorder in their practice was half that of the U.S. national average (0.84% versus 1.69%). The rate of ADHD in the practice was also about half the national rate. According to the authors, “The data indicate that unvaccinated children in the practice are not unhealthier than the vaccinated and indeed the overall results may indicate that the unvaccinated pediatric patients in this practice are healthier overall than the vaccinated.”19
The researchers call for more studies on this topic to be done independently from the vaccine industry, emphasizing the need for unbiased research in understanding the impact of vaccinations on children’s health. Canadian oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis explained:20
“The results were not even remotely close in comparison. It is a total knockout. If you listened to the TV Media you would think that results would be just the opposite of these findings. There is a reason in 100 years of Vaccinating Children there have NEVER been retrospective studies.
Don’t you want to see 5-, 10-, 15- or even 20-year studies of the vaxxed vs unvaxxed? Wouldn’t that be VERY Helpful? Why has there never been any studies like this?
They would 100% PROVE without Shadow of a Doubt that not only do Vaccines NOT prevent infections and transmission but they are severely harming children – especially for Allergies, Middle Ear Infections, Autism, Breathing issues, Sinusitis, Respiratory Infections, Eye Infections, Gastroenteritis, Eczema and Behavioral issues.
IF Vaccines PREVENT Infections then why are infections Significantly Higher in all of Dr. Thomas’ vaccinated children? These are serious life changing chronic conditions. Vaccines shift the immune system to Allergy and Autoimmunity, and you have more and more infections of other kinds.
In short, what does this mean? It means that Vaxcines DESTROY a Child’s Immune System, every vax is different with different live viruses and toxins and they will really hit a child with a weaker immune system first.”
Other Studies Show Health Issues More Common in Vaxxed Children
While the mainstream narrative only shares the notion that “vaccines are safe and effective,” several studies have shown this isn’t always the case. One study looked at health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children from three medical practices in the U.S.21
Vaccinated children were much more likely to have several health issues compared to unvaccinated children. Specifically, the chances of being diagnosed with severe allergies, autism, gastrointestinal disorders, asthma, ADHD and chronic ear infections were significantly higher for vaccinated children.
For example, vaccinated children had over four times the risk of severe allergies and over 20 times the risk of ADHD compared to unvaccinated children. The vaccinated children who were not breastfed or delivered by cesarean section had the highest risk of negative health outcomes.
Another study found that children vaccinated before their first birthday had a higher chance of experiencing developmental delays, asthma and ear infections.22 The more vaccine doses the children received, the higher their risk for these health issues became. Further, when the scientists looked at developmental delays over time, the risk increased as children got older, from 6 months up to 24 months of age.
The risk for four health conditions — developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders — also increased when they extended the age for possible diagnosis from at least 3 years to at least 5 years. In another example, researchers looked into the health of U.S. children who are homeschooled, comparing those who had been vaccinated with those who hadn’t.23
While the vaccinated children were less likely to have had chickenpox or whooping cough (pertussis), they were more likely to have had pneumonia, ear infections, allergies, and neurodevelopmental disorders such as a learning disability, ADHD or autism.
A particularly high risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) was found in children who were both born prematurely and vaccinated, with these children being 6.6 times more likely to have NDDs compared to other children.
The fact that no link was found between premature birth and NDDs among the unvaccinated raises the disturbing possibility that the vaccination schedule for premature babies could be responsible for the neurological disorders some premature babies exhibit, which have been previously assumed to be simply a result of premature birth.
-
The Importance of Prayer: How a Christian Gold Company Stands Out by Defending Americans’ Retirement
Past research published in the journal Human & Experimental Toxicology also showed infant mortality rates correlated with childhood vaccination rates, with high-uptake countries having higher child mortality.24 A reanalysis of the study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Cureus in February 2023, reaffirmed the positive correlation between number of vaccine doses and infant mortality rates.25
As it stands, the childhood vaccine schedule shouldn’t be considered safe and effective for all — and mRNA COVID-19 shots’ association with increased mortality and other significant health issues should give everyone pause. If you’ve developed unusual symptoms after a COVID-19 shot or other vaccination, seek out help from an expert.
The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) also has a treatment protocol for COVID-19 shot injuries. It’s called I-RECOVER and can be downloaded from covid19criticalcare.com.26
- 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 The Expose March 3, 2024
- 2 U.K. Office for National Statistics, Deaths by vaccination status, England, August 25, 2023
- 4 Rumble, The HighWire with Del Bigtree, Is the COVID Vaccine Causing Turbo Cancers? September 22, 2023
- 8 Cureus January 24, 2024
- 9, 15 Cureus January 24, 2024, Abstract
- 10 Cureus January 24, 2024, Review
- 11 Substack, Steve Kirsch’s newsletter February 18, 2024
- 12 Substack, Courageous Discourse February 24, 2024
- 13 World Tribune February 5, 2024
- 14 Children’s Health Defense January 29, 2024
- 16, 18, 19 Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov; 17(22): 8674
- 17, 20 Substack, COVID Intel, Dr. William Makis April 2, 2024
- 21 JTranslSci 7: June 12, 2021 DOI: 10.15761/JTS.1000459
- 22 SAGE Open Med. 2020; 8: 2050312120925344
- 23 J Transl Sci 3: April 24, 2017 DOI: 10.15761/JTS.1000186
- 24 Human & Experimental Toxicology May 4, 2011
- 25 Cureus February 2, 2023; 15(2): e34566
- 26 Covid19criticalcare.com
Five Things New “Preppers” Forget When Getting Ready for Bad Times Ahead
The preparedness community is growing faster than it has in decades. Even during peak times such as Y2K, the economic downturn of 2008, and Covid, the vast majority of Americans made sure they had plenty of toilet paper but didn’t really stockpile anything else.
Things have changed. There’s a growing anxiety in this presidential election year that has prompted more Americans to get prepared for crazy events in the future. Some of it is being driven by fearmongers, but there are valid concerns with the economy, food supply, pharmaceuticals, the energy grid, and mass rioting that have pushed average Americans into “prepper” mode.
There are degrees of preparedness. One does not have to be a full-blown “doomsday prepper” living off-grid in a secure Montana bunker in order to be ahead of the curve. In many ways, preparedness isn’t about being able to perfectly handle every conceivable situation. It’s about being less dependent on government for as long as possible. Those who have proper “preps” will not be waiting for FEMA to distribute emergency supplies to the desperate masses.
Below are five things people new to preparedness (and sometimes even those with experience) often forget as they get ready. All five are common sense notions that do not rely on doomsday in order to be useful. It may be nice to own a tank during the apocalypse but there’s not much you can do with it until things get really crazy. The recommendations below can have places in the lives of average Americans whether doomsday comes or not.
Note: The information provided by this publication or any related communications is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice. We do not provide personalized investment, financial, or legal advice.
Secured Wealth
Whether in the bank or held in a retirement account, most Americans feel that their life’s savings is relatively secure. At least they did until the last couple of years when de-banking, geopolitical turmoil, and the threat of Central Bank Digital Currencies reared their ugly heads.
It behooves Americans to diversify their holdings. If there’s a triggering event or series of events that cripple the financial systems or devalue the U.S. Dollar, wealth can evaporate quickly. To hedge against potential turmoil, many Americans are looking in two directions: Crypto and physical precious metals.
There are huge advantages to cryptocurrencies, but there are also inherent risks because “virtual” money can become challenging to spend. Add in the push by central banks and governments to regulate or even replace cryptocurrencies with their own versions they control and the risks amplify. There’s nothing wrong with cryptocurrencies today but things can change rapidly.
As for physical precious metals, many Americans pay cash to keep plenty on hand in their safe. Rolling over or transferring retirement accounts into self-directed IRAs is also a popular option, but there are caveats. It can often take weeks or even months to get the gold and silver shipped if the owner chooses to close their account. This is why Genesis Gold Group stands out. Their relationship with the depositories allows for rapid closure and shipping, often in less than 10 days from the time the account holder makes their move. This can come in handy if things appear to be heading south.
Lots of Potable Water
One of the biggest shocks that hit new preppers is understanding how much potable water they need in order to survive. Experts claim one gallon of water per person per day is necessary. Even the most conservative estimates put it at over half-a-gallon. That means that for a family of four, they’ll need around 120 gallons of water to survive for a month if the taps turn off and the stores empty out.
Being near a fresh water source, whether it’s a river, lake, or well, is a best practice among experienced preppers. It’s necessary to have a water filter as well, even if the taps are still working. Many refuse to drink tap water even when there is no emergency. Berkey was our previous favorite but they’re under attack from regulators so the Alexapure systems are solid replacements.
For those in the city or away from fresh water sources, storage is the best option. This can be challenging because proper water storage containers take up a lot of room and are difficult to move if the need arises. For “bug in” situations, having a larger container that stores hundreds or even thousands of gallons is better than stacking 1-5 gallon containers. Unfortunately, they won’t be easily transportable and they can cost a lot to install.
Water is critical. If chaos erupts and water infrastructure is compromised, having a large backup supply can be lifesaving.
Pharmaceuticals and Medical Supplies
There are multiple threats specific to the medical supply chain. With Chinese and Indian imports accounting for over 90% of pharmaceutical ingredients in the United States, deteriorating relations could make it impossible to get the medicines and antibiotics many of us need.
Stocking up many prescription medications can be hard. Doctors generally do not like to prescribe large batches of drugs even if they are shelf-stable for extended periods of time. It is a best practice to ask your doctor if they can prescribe a larger amount. Today, some are sympathetic to concerns about pharmacies running out or becoming inaccessible. Tell them your concerns. It’s worth a shot. The worst they can do is say no.
If your doctor is unwilling to help you stock up on medicines, then Jase Medical is a good alternative. Through telehealth, they can prescribe daily meds or antibiotics that are shipped to your door. As proponents of medical freedom, they empathize with those who want to have enough medical supplies on hand in case things go wrong.
Energy Sources
The vast majority of Americans are locked into the grid. This has proven to be a massive liability when the grid goes down. Unfortunately, there are no inexpensive remedies.
Those living off-grid had to either spend a lot of money or effort (or both) to get their alternative energy sources like solar set up. For those who do not want to go so far, it’s still a best practice to have backup power sources. Diesel generators and portable solar panels are the two most popular, and while they’re not inexpensive they are not out of reach of most Americans who are concerned about being without power for extended periods of time.
Natural gas is another necessity for many, but that’s far more challenging to replace. Having alternatives for heating and cooking that can be powered if gas and electric grids go down is important. Have a backup for items that require power such as manual can openers. If you’re stuck eating canned foods for a while and all you have is an electric opener, you’ll have problems.
Don’t Forget the Protein
When most think about “prepping,” they think about their food supply. More Americans are turning to gardening and homesteading as ways to produce their own food. Others are working with local farmers and ranchers to purchase directly from the sources. This is a good idea whether doomsday comes or not, but it’s particularly important if the food supply chain is broken.
Most grocery stores have about one to two weeks worth of food, as do most American households. Grocers rely heavily on truckers to receive their ongoing shipments. In a crisis, the current process can fail. It behooves Americans for multiple reasons to localize their food purchases as much as possible.
Long-term storage is another popular option. Canned foods, MREs, and freeze dried meals are selling out quickly even as prices rise. But one component that is conspicuously absent in shelf-stable food is high-quality protein. Most survival food companies offer low quality “protein buckets” or cans of meat, but they are often barely edible.
Prepper All-Naturals offers premium cuts of steak that have been cooked sous vide and freeze dried to give them a 25-year shelf life. They offer Ribeye, NY Strip, and Tenderloin among others.
Having buckets of beans and rice is a good start, but keeping a solid supply of high-quality protein isn’t just healthier. It can help a family maintain normalcy through crises.
Prepare Without Fear
With all the challenges we face as Americans today, it can be emotionally draining. Citizens are scared and there’s nothing irrational about their concerns. Being prepared and making lifestyle changes to secure necessities can go a long way toward overcoming the fears that plague us. We should hope and pray for the best but prepare for the worst. And if the worst does come, then knowing we did what we could to be ready for it will help us face those challenges with confidence.
