Support undeniable patriot Mike Lindell (and us!). Buy from MyPillow with promo code “JDR” at checkout or call 800-862-0382.
Across the globe, Big Pharma and various governments have teamed up to accelerate the process for mandatory coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination, despite data that shows the many negative side effects linked to different vaccines.
Article by Zoey Sky from Natural News.
One Israeli researcher and professor has recently revealed that Pfizer used questionable tactics to obtain the Food and Drug Administration‘s (FDA) authorization for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for children as young as 12.
Pfizer risking the health of young children for profit
Regardless of the many risks associated with coronavirus vaccines, mandatory vaccination programs are often quickly rolled out in many countries,
As of writing, millions of doses of experimental vaccines have been administered while researchers have yet to determine the full extent of vaccine-related health risks to people of various ages. Even 12-year-old children are now allowed to get vaccinated because of Pfizer’s efforts to earn EUA for the age group.
But Dr. Yaffa Shir-Raz, a researcher from Israel, warned that Pfizer violated its own protocol to ensure that its vaccine can be administered to young children.
On June 8, Shir-Raz, a researcher and fellow at the University of Haifa and Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya in Israel, wrote an article detailing how Pfizer violated the company’s own protocols.
The article was published on America’s Frontline Doctors’ website.
Build your own med-kit by filling it with various Med Packs of your choosing. You know what you need.
In the article, Shir-Raz explained that Pfizer allowed children with pre-existing psychiatric conditions to be enrolled in the trial despite the fact that this was listed as exclusion criteria in the company’s documentation.
According to the review document Pfizer submitted to the FDA, four of the 1,131 children in the study given the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine experienced serious adverse events (SAEs) or events wherein “at least one criterion was met: caused death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, or congenital anomaly/birth defect.”
Because of Pfizer’s decision, three children (out of 1,131) ended up requiring hospitalization for severe depression within one to 15 days of inoculation:
- One child in the first seven days after the first dose
- Another child in the second only one day after the second dose
- And the last child in the third 15 days after the first dose
Pfizer admitted that all three children had pre-existing anxiety or depression. Additionally, the children started using a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) one to two months before the study began.
But instead of taking the blame, Pfizer claimed that the new SSRI was linked to depression among the young participants. But according to Shir-Raz says, “worsening suicidal ideation that would necessitate hospitalization typically occurs within two weeks and not more than a month after starting SSRIs.”
This suggests that Pfizer’s claim that the SSRIs are at fault instead of the vaccine is “doubtful.” (Related: Pfizer pushes ahead with plans to push coronavirus vaccines on younger children, including toddlers and infants.)
Pfizer also violated its own protocol by including these children in the trial.
Shir-Raz warned that the consequence of the finding is “extremely worrying” since it suggests at one in every 350-400 children who are vaccinated could develop severe depression and require hospitalization.
Whatever they throw at us next, be ready. Dr. Zelenko’s new Z-DTox makes your immune system clean, resilient, and resistant.
Pfizer and Big Pharma must be held accountable for these manipulative tactics
But that’s not all. Shir-Raz added that Pfizer used other questionable tactics for the trial.
- The trial only had a six-month follow-up in its entirety, which is less than the recommended one to four years of follow-up required by the FDA.
- Because of how the protocol was designed, Pfizer only needed to report serious adverse events occurring within the first month after inoculation to the FDA. This means adverse events occurring later wouldn’t be considered in the FDA’s safety analysis and that Pfizer’s findings would seem more positive than they actually are.
- Pfizer investigators were allowed to define the adverse events for themselves (“As elicited by investigative site staff”) instead of relying on any diagnosis from medical professionals at a hospital.
Like other pharmaceutical companies only interested in profit, Pfizer has already paid billions in settlements for medical injuries and other matters. In fact, Pfizer is known to have paid the largest fine ever ($2.3 billion) for a fraud lawsuit filed by the Department of Justice over illegal marketing claims.
Shir-Raz also advised that the blame isn’t solely on Pfizer. After all, the FDA allowed Pfizer to include only one month of data for its safety analysis.
The public deserves to know why the FDA quickly approved the EUA for children.
Finally, why did the FDA, which receives at least 45 percent of its funding from the drug companies that it regulates, approve the study protocol despite the potential dangers associated with coronavirus vaccines?
Visit Vaccines.news to read more articles about how Big Pharma violates protocols and causes harm for profit.
New Conservative Network Seeks Crowdfunding Help
They say we have to go big or go home. We’re trying to go big and bring the patriotic truth the the nation, but we need help.
Readers may or may not realize that over the past year, we’ve been bringing more conservative news and opinion outlets under our wing. Don’t take our expansion as a sign of riches; all of the “acquisitions” have been through sweat and promises of greater things to come for all involved. As a result, we’ve been able to bring together several independent media sites under a unified vision of preventing America from succumbing to the progressive, “woke,” Neo-Marxist ideologies that are spreading like wildfire across America.
The slow and steady reopening of America is revealing there was a lot more economic hardship brought about from the Covd-19 lockdowns than most realize. While we continue to hope advertising dollars on the sites go up, it’s simply not enough to do things the right way. We are currently experiencing a gap between revenue and expenses that cannot be overcome by click-ads and MyPillow promos alone (promo code “NOQ” by the way).
To overcome our revenue gap and keep these sites running, our needs fluctuate between $3000-$7000 per month. In other words, we’re in the red and hemorrhaging.
The best way you can help us grow and continue to bring the truth to the people is by donating. We appreciate everything, whether a dollar or $10,000. Anything brings us closer to a point of stability when we can hire writers, editors, and support staff to make the America First message louder. Our Giving Fuel page makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can donate through PayPal as well.
As the world spirals towards radical progressivism, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. Please help keep NOQ Report and the other sites in the network going.
Thank you and God Bless,
They’re Trying to Shut Us Down
Over the last several months, I’ve lost count of how many times the powers-that-be have tried to shut us down. They’ve sent hackers at us, forcing us to take extreme measures on web security. They sent attorneys after us, but thankfully we’re not easily intimidated by baseless accusations or threats. They’ve even gone so far as to make physical threats. Those can actually be a bit worrisome but Remington has me covered.
For us to continue to deliver the truth that Americans need to read and hear, we ask you, our amazing audience, for financial assistance. We just launched a GiveSendGo page to help us pay the bills. It’s brand new so don’t be discouraged by the lack of donations there. It’s a funny reality that the fewer the donations that have been made, the less likely people are willing to donate to it. One would think this is counterintuitive, but sometimes people are skeptical because they think that perhaps there’s a reason others haven’t been donating. In our situation, we’re just getting started so please don’t be shy if you have the means to help.
Thank you and God bless!